Erectile Dysfunction
Body of evidence strength Grade C in support of a Strong or Moderate Recommendation indicates that the statement
Clinical Trials
For men with ED, low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) should be considered investigational. For men with ED, intracavernosal stem cell therapy should be considered investigational: (Conditional Recommendation; Evidence Level: Grade C) For men with ED, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy should be considered experimental. This guideline's purpose is to provide direction to clinicians and to men who have ED. The guideline focuses on how to recognize ED, how to conduct a valid diagnostic process, and how to approach treatment with the goals of restoring sexual function and enhancing the man and his partner's quality of life (QoL) while minimizing adverse events (AEs) and diagnosis- and treatment-associated burden. The strategies and approaches recommended in this document were derived from evidence-based and consensus-based processes.
Printable Information
There is a continually expanding literature on ED; the Panel notes that this document constitutes a clinical strategy; it is intended to be interpreted with appreciation for the dynamic, evolving understanding of ED causes and treatments. The most effective approach for a particular man is best determined by that man (in consultation with his partner, when applicable) in collaboration with the clinician and with full consideration of the relevant history, values, and goals for treatment using a shared decision-making (SDM) approach. As our understanding of ED evolves and improves, the strategies presented here will be amended to remain consistent with the highest standards of clinical care. A systematic review was conducted to identify published articles relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of ED. Literature ed tablets searches were performed on English-language publications using the Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from 1/1/1965 to 7/29/2017. can be applied to most men in most circumstances
| Product | Dosage | Quantity + Bonus | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viagra Generic | 200mg | 60 + 4 Pills | 125.19€ 119.23€ | |
| Kamagra Soft Tabs | 100 mg | 120 + 6 Pills | 311.78€ 296.93€ | |
| Cialis Generic | 5mg | 120 + 6 Pills | 132.92€ 126.59€ | |
| Viagra Generic | 200mg | 270 + 10 Pills | 379.76€ 361.68€ | |
| Levitra Original | 20mg | 48 + 4 Pills | 235.14€ 223.94€ | |
| Cialis Professional | 40mg | 120 + 4 Pills | 436.68€ 415.89€ | |
| Kamagra Polo | 100 mg | 84 + 4 Pills | 244.49€ 232.85€ | |
| Kamagra Gold | 50 mg | 12 Pills | 47.30€ 45.05€ | |
| Levitra Original | 20mg | 4 Pills | 45.87€ 43.69€ | |
| Kamagra Effervescent Tablets | 100 mg | 63 + 7 Pills | 171.99€ 163.80€ | |
| Cialis Generic | 40mg | 30 + 4 Pills | 74.97€ 71.40€ | |
| Kamagra Gold | 50 mg | 84 + 6 Pills | 224.77€ 214.07€ | |
| Cialis Generic | 40mg | 180 + 10 Pills | 277.29€ 264.09€ | |
| Levitra Generic | 20mg | 60 + 6 Pills | 131.11€ 124.87€ | |
| Viagra Generic | 150mg | 120 + 8 Pills | 177.58€ 169.12€ |
but that better evidence is likely to change confidence.
Treatment for Erectile Dysfunction
Men with ED should be informed regarding the treatment option of a vacuum erection device (VED), including discussion of benefits and risks/burdens. Men with ED should be informed regarding the treatment option of intraurethral (IU) alprostadil, including discussion of benefits and risks/burdens. For men with ED who are considering the use of IU alprostadil, an in-office test should be performed. Men with ED should be informed regarding the treatment option of intracavernosal injections (ICI), including discussion of benefits and risks/burdens. For men with ED who are considering ICI therapy, an in-office injection test should be performed.
Table 2. Medications and Substances That May Cause or Contribute to Erectile Dysfunction
Men with ED should be informed regarding the treatment option of penile prosthesis implantation, including discussion of benefits and risks/burdens. Men with ED who have decided on penile implantation surgery should be counseled regarding post-operative expectations. Penile prosthetic surgery should not be performed in the presence of systemic, cutaneous, or urinary tract infection. For young men with ED and focal pelvic/penile arterial occlusion and without documented generalized vascular disease or veno-occlusive dysfunction, penile arterial reconstruction may be considered. For men with ED, penile venous surgery is not recommended. Body of evidence strength Grade C is only
Lifestyle Changes
Men should be counseled that ED is a risk marker for underlying cardiovascular disease (CVD) and other health conditions that may warrant evaluation and treatment. In men with ED, morning serum total testosterone levels should be measured. For some men with ED, specialized testing and evaluation may be necessary to guide treatment. For men being treated for ED, referral to a mental health professional should be considered to promote treatment adherence, reduce performance anxiety, and integrate treatments into a sexual relationship. Clinicians should counsel men with ED who have comorbidities known to negatively affect erectile function that lifestyle modifications, including changes in diet and increased physical activity, improve overall health and may improve erectile function.
Gene Miluk
Men with ED should be informed regarding the treatment option of an FDA-approved oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i), including discussion of benefits and risks/burdens, unless contraindicated. When men are prescribed an oral PDE5i for the treatment of ED, instructions should be provided to maximize benefit/efficacy. For men who are prescribed PDE5i, the dose should be titrated to provide optimal efficacy. Men who desire preservation of erectile function after treatment for prostate cancer by radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RT) should be informed that early use of PDE5i post-treatment may not improve spontaneous, unassisted erectile function. Men with ED and testosterone deficiency (TD) who are considering ED treatment with a PDE5i should be informed that PDE5i may be more effective if combined with testosterone therapy. rarely used in support of a Strong Recommendation.
| Procedure | Description | Risks |
|---|---|---|
| Penile Implants | Inflatable or semi-rigid devices implanted in penis | Infection, mechanical failure |
| Vascular Surgery | Repairs or bypasses blood vessels in penis | Usually for younger men with vascular disease |
| Penile Artery Revascularization | Restores blood flow in specific cases | Limited success, specialized procedure |
Conditional Recommendations also can be supported
Can Vacuum Devices Help With Erectile Dysfunction?
Data from studies published after the literature search cut-off will be incorporated into the next version of this guideline. Preclinical studies (e.g., animal models), commentary, and editorials were excluded. Additional exclusion criteria included data not relevant to current practice (e.g., reports on medications not in current clinical use, outcomes for prostheses models that are no longer available), articles focused primarily on surgical technique with minimal or no patient information or outcomes reported, no outcomes reported or outcomes data not extractable, or duplicate report of data presented elsewhere. Review article references were checked to ensure inclusion of all possibly relevant studies. Multiple reports on the same patient group were carefully examined to ensure inclusion of only non-redundant information.
Drugs That Can Cause ED
The systematic review yielded a total of 999 publications relevant to preparation of the guideline. Data on study type (e.g., published systematic review/meta-analysis, randomized controlled trial [RCT], controlled clinical trial [CCT], observational study), treatment parameters (e.g., type of treatment, dosing, follow-up), patient characteristics (e.g., age, symptom duration, ED severity), outcomes (e.g., effects on erectile function, QoL), and AEs were extracted. Quality of Studies and Determination of Evidence Strength. The quality of published systematic reviews was assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR).1 Individual studies that were RCTs or CCTs were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.2 The quality of case-control studies and comparative observational studies was rated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale.1004 Because there is no widely-agreed upon quality assessment tool for single cohort observational studies, the quality of these studies was not assessed. The categorization of evidence strength is conceptually distinct from the quality of individual studies. by any body of evidence strength.
Lifestyle and home remedies
Evidence strength refers to the body of evidence available for a particular question and includes not only individual study quality but consideration of study design; consistency of findings across studies; adequacy of sample sizes; and generalizability of samples, settings, and treatments for the purposes of the guideline. The American Urological Association (AUA) categorizes body of evidence strength as Grade A (well-conducted and highly-generalizable RCTs or exceptionally strong observational studies with consistent findings), Grade B (RCTs with some weaknesses of procedure or generalizability or moderately strong observational studies with consistent findings), or Grade C (RCTs with serious deficiencies of procedure or generalizability or extremely small sample sizes or observational studies that are inconsistent, have small sample sizes, or have other problems that potentially confound interpretation of data). By definition, Grade A evidence is evidence about which the Panel has a high level of certainty, Grade B evidence is evidence about which the Panel has a moderate level of certainty, and Grade C evidence is evidence about which the Panel has a low level of certainty.3 AUA Nomenclature: Linking Statement Type to Evidence Strength. The AUA nomenclature system explicitly links statement type to body of evidence strength, level of certainty, magnitude of benefit or risk/burdens, and the Panel's judgment regarding the balance between benefits and risks/burdens (See the Table 1 button below). Strong Recommendations are directive statements that an action should (benefits outweigh risks/burdens) or should not (risks/burdens outweigh benefits) be undertaken because net benefit or net harm is substantial. When body of evidence strength is Grade A,
- Medications for ED are available by prescription and should be used safely.
- A balanced diet rich in fruits, vegetables, and whole grains supports heart health.
- Addressing relationship issues can reduce performance pressure.
- Alternative medicine approaches include herbal remedies, though evidence varies.
- Increased physical activity boosts nitric oxide production, aiding erections.
- Hormonal evaluation helps determine if testosterone therapy is appropriate.
- Caring for mental health reduces psychological barriers to sexual function.
the statement indicates that benefits and risks/burdens appear
| Treatment Type | Average Cost per Session/Procedure | Insurance Coverage | Invasiveness |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oral Medications | $10 - $30 per pill | Varies | Minimal |
| Vacuum Device | $150 - $400 initial | Usually not covered | Non-invasive |
| Injectable Therapy | $50 - $100 per injection | Sometimes covered | Invasive |
| Penile Implants | $10,000 - $20,000 upfront | Usually not covered | Surgical |
balanced, the best action depends on the man's
- Oral drugs are most popular due to ease of use and quick action.
- Healthy diet supports overall vascular health, benefiting erectile function.
- Avoiding illicit drugs can prevent worsening of ED symptoms.
- Physiotherapy like pelvic floor exercises is a non-drug approach.
- Penile prostheses are a permanent solution when other treatments fail.
- Blood tests can identify hormonal or metabolic causes of ED.
- Patient education about treatment options enhances treatment adherence.
circumstances, and future research is unlikely to change confidence.
Why Choose University of Utah Health?
Moderate Recommendations are directive statements that an action should (benefits outweigh risks/burdens) or should not (risks/burdens outweigh benefits) be undertaken because net benefit or net harm is moderate. Conditional Recommendations are non-directive statements used when the evidence indicates that there is no apparent net benefit or harm or when the balance between benefits and risks/burden is unclear. All three statement types may be supported by any body of evidence strength grade. Body of evidence strength Grade A in support of a Strong or Moderate Recommendation indicates that the statement can be applied to most men in most circumstances and that future research is unlikely to change confidence. Body of evidence strength Grade B in support of a Strong or Moderate Recommendation indicates that the statement can be applied to most men in most circumstances but that better evidence could change confidence.
